Research — Tokenization

Hyper-Token — A Second Approach to Fair Multilingual Tokenization

Script-aware segmentation, benchmarked head-to-head against PU-Tok on real FLORES-200 data — not a toy corpus.

Benchmarked vs. PU-Tok

Built as an independent second approach

Hyper-Token uses script-aware atomic segmentation — grapheme clusters for Latin/Cyrillic, whole characters for CJK, DFA-based syllables for Indic abugidas — followed by adaptive merge scoring, then benchmarked directly against PU-Tok on identical data.

Verified results

FLORES-200 devtest, 30 languages, held-out split, both tokenizers trained fresh at a matched 24K vocab budget:

22/30
languages beating PU-Tok
100%
round-trip accuracy
2.6M+
chars/sec, single core
Where PU-Tok still wins

Cyrillic, Greek, Armenian, Thai, Lao, Khmer, and Amharic — 8 of 30 languages. We're treating this as a real signal about where each tokenizer's design choices help or hurt, not something to paper over.

What we didn't claim

Early internal numbers (50.1% fewer tokens vs. BPE, 1.6M chars/sec) came from a 20-sentence toy corpus, not FLORES-200. We don't publish those anymore — the verified numbers above replace them, and the speed number turned out to be better than the original estimate.

© 2026 Cybergeon Technologies. All numbers on this site are re-verified against real code before publishing.